Category: Bill gates

The real world, Apple…

A Mac user at work, yesterday…

I’m currently in a long term contract as a graphic design freelancer for a solidly PC-based company.

As I’ve said before, the means me having to use Windows exclusively. 

This isn’t a problem as I’ve used Windows on and off throughout my career. 

Through my career I’ve usually had to manage a suite of Macs that sit within larger PC-based businesses. 

I’ve only really seen fully Mac-based businesses in design agencies and even then, there’s always a smattering of PCs around. 

For the most part, I’ve managed this by keeping Macs and PCs separate. 

Separate servers, separate workflows and the 2 worlds only cross when they have to, email, internet, networking etc. 

I’ve done it this way because despite Apple advertising, connecting Macs to PC environments is frustrating at best and impossible at worst. 

Yes – everybody tries to get along, but Apple’s SMB implementation is lacklustre and its Active Directory support is laughable. 

Even though SMB is the officially supported file sharing protocol at Apple, and it’s ok Mac-to-Mac, it doesn’t use the latest version and is comically slow when connecting to PC shares, to the point where you have to disable features via the Terminal to get it to work. 

I’ve always avoided connecting via Active Directory simply because it can’t be relied upon. It just doesn’t really work and from what I can glean online Apple are dropping support for it. 

Apple are just not interested in playing nicely, or just don’t see the point of it. 

This is why the Mac share of the wider PC market and its share of their internal revenue at Apple is stubborn in its growth. 

Their advertising waxes lyrically about how fast, intuitive and productive their Macs are, but they say nothing about actually how you can incorporate Macs into your business. 

They just don’t want to put the effort into this. 

They certainly are…

This was brought into sharp relief recently when out of the blue I was asked about the issues my workplace are having in the design department where I’m contracted, what could be done about it and whether moving to the Mac would help?

Now a bit of background on where I’m working currently. 

There’s 5 graphic designers here and 2 marketing assistants. All using Windows. 

We use an outside design agency for video work (which is Mac based) and this agency is part owned by the owner of the company  

You can see where this is going. 

We have lots of issues here and they all centre around the fact that their IT team, just don’t understand the size and complexity of the files and workflows the we use daily. 

Storage is the main issue. 

We create about 5 gigabytes of content a week and we store all that on an old networked PC in a locked room somewhere. 

We connect to it using 10-baseT Ethernet. 

Yes you read that right. 

Their IT department are full of clever, qualified people, but in terms of large scale deployment of professional design workstations they are dangerously arrogant. 

They are used to a world of ignorant users who use Microsoft Outlook, Microsoft Teams and push tiny Microsoft Office documents around, all on the back of a Microsoft cloud based storage system. 

The storage for the studio is a spinning HD of about 1TB and it fills up fast, so we have to constantly move this somewhere else so we can keep working. 

IT flatly refused to invest in more robust local storage – their solution to all this is to use Microsoft SharePoint. 

This of course isn’t a solution. 

It’s cloud based and syncs back and forth as needed. 

Fine if you’re using Office documents, small JPEG’s etc. 

Not fine when you’re using InDesign with large placed files, Character Animator files which number in the 100s per project or huge Adobe Dimension, After Effects or Dimension files for instance. 

So I quickly managed to convince them not to go down that road. 

A design studio needs fast, local, networked storage that’s backed up. 

So I was asked about this problem, and because the owner owns an agency that use Macs, I’ve been asked to come up with a solution, potentially using Macs. 

I’ve deliberated long and hard about this and I’ve come to a sad conclusion.

I can’t recommend the Mac. 

Despite me banging on about how good Macs are for 3 decades, in the real world your computer isn’t an isolated asset. 

It has to exist in an ecosystem. 

It has to play nice. 

That ‘it just works’ mentality that Apple has, must apply in all circumstances. 

But it doesn’t. 

Yes, if you’re buying a Mac for personal use or you’re a start-up or a (very) small business then a Mac is a good choice.

I don’t need to tell you that I consider Macs the best computers around, they’re fast, reliable and the OS is simply the pinnacle of excellence. 

But in larger corporations, none of that matters. 

Putting a Mac in place would mean a huge amount of training, infrastructure changes, strict workflows and staff on hand to handle issues. 

There will be less issues for the user for sure, but it’s a huge change for the company’s IT team. 

Unless you delegate an experienced Mac user to act as the IT go-between. 

This is what I’ve done in the past, but it’s not something I want to do in the future. 

So I’m recommending that the company stick to Windows, and just beef up their storage. 

A NAS RAID is obvious here that’s connected locally on the network. It’s not that difficult to figure this out. 

Pretty standard for a design studio…

So what lessons can be learnt from this?

Well in some alternative timeline where Apple thought that this was important, it means working closely with Microsoft. 

Much more closely. 

Close, as in having Mac staff actually on site with Microsoft to make all this networking bulletproof and ‘just work’ out of the box.  

I think Microsoft of today is ideally placed to help here – this isn’t Ballmer’s & Gates show anymore. 

The new Microsoft wants their tech to work everywhere. 

But we don’t exist in that timeline. 

We exist in the timeline where Apple just aren’t seeing that the Mac is an area of growth. 

We have the Apple that’s obsessed with service revenue and the entertainment arena and of course, the iPhone. 

Not one that wants to grow the market share and mind share of the Mac. 

As my bio states, I’ll defend the Mac until the end of my days because Apple certainly won’t. 

If someone like me wants to recommend the Mac, but can’t due to Apple’s intransigence, what does the future hold for it?

Apple Will Murder Microsoft and Bury It With BlackBerrys Corpse – Rocco Riffs – TheStreet

Have a nice day...

Apple Will Murder Microsoft and Bury It With BlackBerrys Corpse – Rocco Riffs – TheStreet.

This is a significant article.

I’ve written at length for my distrust of Microsoft, representing in my view, a road that personal and business computing should have never gone down.

Microsoft got lucky with DOS – everything else, Windows, Office, Sharepoint, .Net, Exchange – it’s all momentum from that huge mistake that IBM made all those years ago, letting Bill Gates provide a disk operating system he didn’t even own at that point.

It allowed ‘computing for the rest of us’ to be a ridiculed statement made by a company that didn’t understand what ‘business’ needed.

Over the years, Apple has struggled on, sometimes lacking any direction, sometimes having the odd big success, but even that was dismissed as transitory – the mantra being that Apple needs a hit every year or two, otherwise it would just fade away.

Meanwhile Microsoft soldiered on, knowing that their army of IT people whose jobs depended on Microsoft staying in pole position, would keep them healthy.

An almost parasitic dependancy on each other developed, Microsoft need those IT managers to keep fooling company’s into believing there is no alternative, and those IT managers need Microsoft to keep the technology just opaque enough so that their jobs are safe, the rest of us suffered, or worse, carried on, not even knowing there was an alternative.

One thing they didn’t bank on was BYOD – bring your own device. Even in my little corner of the world, away from the US and even London, I’ve seen the effect. More people are choosing ‘anything but Microsoft’ for their personal computer and phone needs.

It’s still early days, and I don’t see a Mac on every desk anytime soon, but the article puts it perfectly:

“These days consumer preference dictates enterprise decisions. If you’re not powerfully out in front with the consumer, you’re going to end up getting hurt in the enterprise. That’s why it was smart for IBM to partner with Apple. Led by Apple, they’ll bury Microsoft in the same grave BlackBerry cluelessly fell into.”

Apple’s joint enterprise with IBM is very significant, as is this article. I’ve never seen any commentator dare even mention this as an option. I’ve also never seen anything like this from Apple either.

The enterprise doesn’t mention Macs, but I can understand that. In the eyes of business, the Mac brand is tainted (even though it’s a world away from the Mac of 1984).

However it doesn’t matter – the juggernaut that is iOS is the Mac OS underneath. Everyone knows that, Microsoft knows that, IBM knows that. What they don’t know is what iOS devices Apple will release in the coming years, which will be automatically part of the agreement.

If you consider that iOS and Mac OS will merge at some point and what the device Apple will merge them on will look like, you can start to see a future where we will all be using devices that run iOS.

Any IT manager still clinging on to Windows will use it in the server room where it belongs – just don’t let any normal person near it.

And I haven’t even mentioned the software services that Apple offers as part of this agreement – why would you choose Office when (an admittedly enhanced) iWork is free?

 

 

Ballmer – “we’ll beat Google, someday”…

Their glorious leader comments on Google – ‘we’ll beat them, someday’.

Way back in Apple’s past, when money was tight, market share was none-existent, mind-share even less, the Apple-faithful and the wider tech-press looked to Apple for a solution to their woes.

Just what was Steve Jobs and Apple going to do to stop the downward spiral?

Steve’s answer surprised everyone, and in hindsight it’s the approach that has, in part, turned the company around, and secured their future – Steve Jobs said:

“For Apple to win, Microsoft doesn’t have to lose.”

Most of the Apple faithful balked at this comment, did they here that right? What was Steve Jobs on? Did he really know what he was doing? Surely Microsoft has to be crushed, stamped upon and erased from history so that Apple can ‘win’.

But Steve was right. One of the problems with Apple, was that they were obsessed with Microsoft, and it damaged everything they did, every effort, every promotion was measured against the impossible goal of toppling a giant.

What Steve Jobs did is refocused the company, allowed them to say to themselves, “it’s perfectly OK to have a small market share, there is room in this industry for everyone.” With that approach Apple could concentrate on what they were good at, and measure their success against their own watermark, not somebody elses.

Which brings us back to Ballmer. Wouldn’t it just be a breath of fresh air if Ballmer said:

“We don’t worry about Google – we relish competition, and there’s room in this industry for everyone. We don’t have to win all the time.”

I think the whole tech industry would breath a sigh of relief that at last, Microsoft was happy with it’s lot and concentrated on creating great products for us all.

Can’t cut off their air-supply this time…

Aw, doesn't look harmless?

Aw, doesn't look harmless? Big bad Google hurting his itty-bitty software company...

Microsoft accuses Google of unfair business practices – yes you read that right.

“In a blog post entitled ‘Competition Authorities and Search,’ Microsoft Vice President and Deputy General Counsel Dave Heiner said part of the motivation for Microsoft and Yahoo’s search deal was ‘we are concerned about Google business practices that tend to lock in publishers and advertisers and make it harder for Microsoft to gain search volume,'”

And here’s the killer line:

“according to court documents, Ballmer pledged to ‘f***ing kill Google’ after learning of Google’s plan to hire a key Microsoft engineer in 2005.”

Poor Microsoft are upset that Google isn’t just rolling over and letting them dominate search, just like every other company has let them take over their business-niche before them.

Maybe Microsoft are angry because:

a) they can’t ‘cut off their air supply‘ like they did with Netscape in order to create an abusive monopoly in the internet browser business

b) they can’t blatantly steal code from Google, like they did with Apple’s Quicktime, in order to have a product that got even close to what Apple had

Still, while Microsoft and Google are at loggerheads, it keeps them occupied whilst everyone’s favourite fruit company can stroll past them.

More fun with Gates & Ballmer…

The Zeus Trojan – the God of botnets.

NetWitness found a botnet with control of 74,126 Windows systems spread around 196 countries. These systems are found at medical companies, insurance companies, educational institutions, energy firms, financial companies, Internet providers, and government agencies.

And here:

Prevx came upon a cache with logon credentials for 74,000 FTP accounts. These accounts were for companies such as NASA, Cisco, Kaspersky, McAfee, Symantec, Amazon, Bank of America, Oracle, ABC, BusinessWeek, Bloomberg, Disney, Monster, and the Queensland government.

You know, you start to become jaded concerning the security of the most popular OS on planet Earth.

The OS that 90% of the people viewing this blog use.

The OS that your company runs on.

The OS that your government runs on.

The OS your school, college or university runs on.

The OS that your bank probably uses.

The OS that despite being quite clearly not fit for use, somehow continues to be used, because so many people’s lives dependent on it.

What people? Well you, me, the IT department that won’t even let you change your desktop pattern wallpaper at work, your parents, your friends, the guy you overheard talking in the bus queue this morning about how his computer has become unusable again, or the other guy he was talking to who said that all he had to do was:

a) pay for more security software

b) visit this site that tells you how to solve your latest Windows problem in 38 easy steps

c) buy a new computer

d) don’t do anything on your computer to do with online banking or payments of any kind.

And, yes that last group of people who benefit from the crap that Gates & Ballmer peddle every day – the criminals and ne’r-do-wells that use the money they generate from hacking your computer to buy & supply drugs to your kids, fund terrorism, and various other nasties.

Lots of fun for all concerned.

Thank you Mr Gates and Mr Ballmer for all this, and thank you Apple for allowing me to write this blog on a computer that is not affected by any of this.

Sorry for being so jaded, but I don’t see anyone, anytime soon kicking Windows technology out of the door.